Insurance and risk Management

/0 Comments/in /by

Insurance and risk Management

Assignment HTML Files/Discussion Assignment 3.html

INSR-6008 Discussion #2

Instructions

Starting at the Fanshawe College website at fanshawe.ca find the page that outlines the emergency preparedness and response planning documents for the College.

  • Find the Emergency Guidelines document for the London campus.
  • Find the page that outlines the procedure for a Campus Lockdown for Active Campus Violence (Shelter in Place)
  • Answer the following questions;
    • How many steps did it take you to find the document?
    • How did it make you feel, as a student of Fanshawe College, to know that this type of procedure was in place?
    • Does it meet the standards, as discussed in your text, for a Business Continuity Management.

Your answers should be submitted to the discussion forum for this week by 11:59 pm on Sunday. You will be marked based on the discussion rubric.

How to Submit your Assignment

Post your summary to Discussion #2 – Emergency Guidelines by Sunday at 11:59 pm

Grading Criteria

Access the Rubric for Online Discussions

Assignment Resources and Links

Documents/Rubric for Online Discussions.docx

Rubric for Online Discussions / Assignments # ___ Name ___________________________________________ Score: _____________

Outstanding Good Fair Acceptable Not Completed
Thinking / Reflection Arguments are pertinent to the topic. Arguments are logical and supported with evidence. Highly informative and easy to understand. Appropriate vocabulary is used. Arguments are pertinent to the topic. Arguments are fairly logical and reasonably supported. Arguments are informative, complete and understandable. Appropriate vocabulary is used. Arguments are not consistently pertinent, logical or supported. Somewhat informative and understandable. Arguments not pertinent. Arguments rarely, if at all, logical and supported. Not very informative and understandable. No evidence.
Structure There is a logical flow to the topics / arguments. Conclusion flows clearly from the arguments presented. Discussion is fairly well organized. Conclusion flows from the rest of the discussion. Discussion weakly organized. Conclusion is acceptable. Discussion is not organized. Conclusion doesn’t flow from the rest of the discussion. No evidence.
Interest Factor Language and style are appropriate for intended audience. Main points are memorable. Reader is very engaged. Discussion presents well developed analysis and synthesis. Clearly demonstrates critical thinking. Language and style of discussion appropriate. Reader is engaged. Discussion presents reasonable analysis and synthesis. Demonstrates critical thinking. Language and style only fair. Reader is only somewhat engaged. Less-developed analysis and synthesis. Critical thinking is abstract and hard to follow. Language and style are poor. Reader finds it hard to follow. Analysis and synthesis lacking. There is little evidence of critical thinking. No evidence.
Conclusion The conclusion is engaging and reflects personal learning. The conclusion restates the learning. The conclusion does not adequately restate the learning. Incomplete and/or unfocused. Not applicable.
Mechanics

 No errors in punctuation, capitalization and spelling. No errors in sentence structure and word usage. Almost no errors in punctuation, capitalization and spelling. Almost no errors in sentence structure and word usage. Many errors in punctuation, capitalization and spelling. Many errors in sentence structure and word usage. Numerous and distracting errors in punctuation, capitalization and spelling. Numerous and distracting errors in sentence structure and word usage. Not applicable.

"Get 15% discount on your first 3 orders with us"
Use the following coupon
FIRST15

Order Now
0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *