The purpose of the Discussion Board is to allow students to learn through sharing ideas and experiences as they relate to course content and the DB question. Because it is not possible to engage in two-way dialogue after a conversation has ended, no posts to the DB will be accepted after the end of each unit.

You have found the vulnerabilities in the systems that were identified in the scope of your assessment. The next step in the penetration test is to try to exploit the vulnerabilities. Your manager has asked you to ensure that you check for both authenticated and unauthenticated attack mechanisms.

• Describe the difference between authenticated and unauthenticated attacks. Give at least 2 examples of each.
• Provide details about the topic.

4-6 paragraphs

Discussion question:

The right to counsel exists under the Sixth Amendment. The way in which that right applies to indigent defendants has been the subject of extensive litigation. Roots of the modern right to counsel for indigent defendants date back more than a century. Understanding line-drawing is very important. The line-drawing has evolved over time. A key starting point in determining when the right attaches is understanding what constitutes a critical stage. From there, an indigency determination must be made by the court within Sixth Amendment parameters.

In your main response, address the following: (at least 4 sentences for each)

1. Summarize how the right to counsel has evolved at the state and federal levels through court interpretation of the Sixth Amendment.
2. Explain the implications of failing to comply with the Sixth Amendment during a critical stage of the case process.
3. Illustrate how philosophical underpinnings and public policy influenced the U.S. Supreme Court in key Sixth Amendment right-to-counsel decisions.

The comedienne Jackie Kashian performs at the RISK! Live Show in New York City, telling a slice of life story she never thought she’d tell. Note the stages of development seen in the comedienne’s description in the following vide:

This activity is designed with the intention to assess ability to analyze an individual’s stages of human development using theories that have been discussed in the course material

While viewing this comedienne’s personal life stories as presented in a podcast for which she tells a story from her life, a story she thought she’d never tell, note stages of development or constructs that apply to the experiences as shared at the various stages of life discussed from elementary, adolescence, young adult . . .

Pay attention to indications of the following theories (you may want to jot down notes as you watch this video to help with writing your response). Stages of development and corresponding theories, which may include, but are not limited to the following:

• Freud’s psychosexual development
• Erickson’s psychosocial development
• Piaget’s theory of cognitive development
• Kohlberg’s moral reasoning
• Identity formation theories
• Social learning theories

Write a 1 1/2- to 2-page reflection on the comedienne’s life using the developmental stages, theories and constructs covered in the course material so far.

APA form, one reference page.

Purpose of Assignment

The theory of market economies emphasizes freedom of choice and limited government intervention. The classic argument for government intervention is market failure – the inability of the market economy to correct itself from a dysfunctional state (such as the Great Depression). Students will examine articles from the University library to analyze real-world examples of U.S. government intervention programs and apply current week readings to make intelligent conclusions about the economic policies.

Assignment Steps

Resources: Tutorial help on Excel^® and Word functions can be found on the Microsoft^®Office website. There are also additional tutorials via the web offering support for Office products.

Using the University Library, EBSCOhost, or ProQuest data bases, locate up to three different articles/publications and/or use The Economist Online from the University Library to examine one case of significant government intervention of Low-income rent controls and housing vouchers.

You may access EBSCOhost, ProQuest or The Economist Online through the University Library homepage:

1. Click on the Library tab.
2. Click on the underlined University Library link.
3. Click on General Resources under Library Resources.
4. Click on either EBSCOhost or ProQuest.
5. Go back Library Resources list.
6. Click on View All Resources Alphabetically.
7. Click on Economist.com.

• Develop a minimum 10-slide Microsoft^® PowerPoint^® presentation including detailed speaker notes or voiceover including the following:

• Describe the intervention and detail its history.
• Analyze the arguments for government intervention as opposed to arguments for market-based solutions. Hint: See the information in our course textbook on market failures.
• Examine who may be helped and who may be hurt by the selected government intervention.
• Examine externalities and/or unintended consequences of such intervention.
• Determine the cost trend of the intervention program since its implementation including whether costs are increasing, decreasing, or vary with the state of the economy.
• Evaluate the success or failure of the intervention in achieving its objectives and develop conclusions.
• Recommend whether the program should be continued as is, discontinued, or modified and defend your recommendation.

Note: The use of tables and/or charts to display economic data over the time period discussed is highly encouraged. However, if your source includes the copyright symbol, which looks like this: ©, then you should not copy any table and/or charts from that source. You could use, but are not required to use, charts/graphs retrieved from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis FRED web site as long as the data sources used by FRED to create those charts are government sources such as the Bureau of Economic Analysis or the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Cite a minimum of three scholarly, peer-reviewed references.

DIRECTIONS- For each PROMPT , Your thread should contain 400–500 words. . Each thread should cite at least two references to support the information you present. Each thread should adhere to AMA writing guidelines and any references included in the thread should be formatted in AMA style. Since this is a personal discussion, you are allowed to use first person perspective; however, you should maintain professional decorum in all your posts.

1. Using the data from that study, describe the public health problem in terms of magnitude, person, time and place.
2. Discuss the basic epidemiology measures used in the study. Specifically what measure of risk was used?
3. How was risk calculated? (Hint: Consider a 2 by 2 table to display the data).
4. Do you agree with the authors’ conclusions?
5. What would you infer from the data? Why?

**An example of a cohort based on an entire population comes from the city of Tecumseh, Michigan, which was selected to examine the contribution of environmental and constitutional factors to the maintenance of health and the origins of illness. Begun in 1959–1960, the Tecumseh study successfully enrolled 8,641 persons, 88% of the community residents.12 For some applications, cohort studies may be larger than a given community. The Iowa Women’s Health Study included a random sample of 41,83713 women between the ages of 55 and 69 in 1986 in the entire state.

sources for study-

12.Francis T Jr., Epstein FH. Survey methods in general populations: Tecumseh, Michigan. In: Acheson RM, ed. Comparability in International Epidemiology. Princeton, NJ: Milbank Memorial Fund; 1965:333–342.

13.Bisgard KM, Folsom AR, Hong CP, Sellers TA. Mortality and cancer rates in nonresponders to a prospective study in older women: 5-year follow-up. Am J Epidemiol. 1994;139:990–1000.

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

Prompt 2- Cataracts of the eye may be difficult to diagnose in the early stages. In a study to evaluate the reliability of their diagnoses, two physicians each examined the same 1,000 eyes, without knowing the other’s diagnoses. Each physician found 100 eyes with cataracts.

1. Does this mean that the diagnoses are reliable?
2. Explain your position.
3. How does reliability affect screening and treatment programs for a condition?
4. What are the socio-political ramifications of understanding reliability prior to implementing a screening program?