Summarize the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in both of the cases that are excerpted in the handout

Question
Please review the handout, “Should Cross Burning be Protected,” found in the required reading, and answer both of the following questions:

Summarize the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in both of the cases that are excerpted in the handout. In a few words, explain why the Court, in R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul overturned the decision of the Minnesota Supreme Court. Explain why the Court upheld the Virginia statute in Virginia v. Black.
What did the Court mean when it held, in Virginia v. Black, that “just as any State may regulate only that obscenity which is the most obscene due to its prurient content, so too may a State choose to prohibit only those forms of intimidation that are most likely to inspire fear of bodily harm”?

Your essay response must be a minimum of 500 words, not counting references listed at the end or repeating of the question, and cited per APA guidelines. You are required to use your textbook and may use any outside (library) resources to support your response. All sources used, including the textbook, must be referenced; paraphrased and quoted material must have accompanying citations.


 

. .

get-your-custom-paper

The post Summarize the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in both of the cases that are excerpted in the handout appeared first on USA Dissertation Editors.

"Get 15% discount on your first 3 orders with us"
Use the following coupon
FIRST15

Order Now
0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *