Measuring Social, Environmental, and Economic Impacts , homework help

Discuss the concept of “value” as it relates to social, environmental, and economic inputs. How is value perceived differently from different stakeholders? When looking at sustainability, why is “value” important? What types of metrics help to quantify “value” for stakeholders? Can organizational learning play a role in improving “value”?

Chapter 4 Discussion

Chapter 4 Discussion

No unread replies.No replies.

Read Closing Case Two at the end of Chapter 4 (pp. 159-161), To Share – Or Not to Share, and answer Question 2:

Identify two epolicies that a business could implement to ensure the protection of sensitive corporate data.

General guidelines for all class discussions:

  • You are responsible to post, at minimum, at least three times (including your original introduction) to the Discussion area for the Introduction Discussion Forum. More posts are welcome and encouraged.
  • Post a thorough, grammatically sound response that pertains to the course material by 11:59 PM on Thursday, February 8.
  • You are required to respond to at least two of your classmate’s original posts. They are to be thought provoking responses. In other words, your reply needs to be more detailed than “Great job,” or “I like what you said here.” Responses are due by 11:59 PM on Sunday, February 11.
  • It is critical that you are forthright and genuine with your opinions when it comes to participating in our class discussions. However, it is essential that you tie your opinions into the literature and substance of the topics being covered within the class for that particular week. In other words, your responses should allude to, and suggest a sort of understanding/comprehension of the material being covered in class for that period of time.

Additional requirements:

  • Supplement the textbook information with at least one other source.
  • Do not use the following sources:
    • Wikipedia – no wiki pages at all.
    • Yahoo Answers
    • InfoPlease
    • E-How
  • A website can only be used once per chapter, which means if another student uses a website you must find another.
  • Follow APA Guidelines.
  • Make sure to cite all sources appropriately. (Don’t forget to use quotation marks.)
    • If the work is plagiarized, your grade will be a 0.
    • Remember if what you write is not your words, thoughts, or ideas you must cite the source and quote appropriately.
  • If classmates post to your original discussion, it is important that you respond to their postings.

Click here for help on how to cite sources in APA Style from the SWOSU Library. (Links to an external site.) (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

Click here for further help on APA Guidelines. (Links to an external site.) (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

​”Seniority versus Merit Pay”

“Seniority versus Merit Pay” Please respond to the following:

  • Compare and contrast seniority (longevity) pay with merit pay. Determine the advantages and disadvantages of each, including specific examples to support your response.
  • From the e-Activity, determine which type of pay structure would benefit the company or organization the most. Provide your rationale.

Using Cellphones in the Classroom argumentative essay

Total gonna be around two and half pages long and 5 paragraphs inducing introduction 3 body and one conclusion.using MLA format. Try to avoid web pages! If you really feel that you have found an important web page, then be sure to check the very bottom. If it has been peer reviewed, then there will be a sentence saying such. If that sentence is not there, avoid the page because it is not peer reviewed.Keep your life simple and play it safe! Use the library databases or Google Scholar. Both sources will generate a mostly correct MLA citation for you too!

Patient quality care discussion

A variable that can greatly impact patient care is call light response time. The time that it takes to answer a call light can vary greatly based upon a variety of factors however it can have direct impact upon the care a patient receives. A survey was conducted by Huey-Ming Tzeng looking at call light response times in a variety of settings. This was survey was conducted by reaching out to former patients of which 808 replied to the survey. From the data received from this survey one can state the confidence interval for call light response time. A 95% confidence interval for mean call light response time is 3.36 minutes and 3.76 minutes.

While this data is important in providing quality care, it does not show a true picture of call light response time. What can and does skew this variable is the person that answers the call light. The patient may be medications or want to ask the nurse a question regarding their treatment, so if a CNA were to answer the call light the need of the patient is not being met. The call light may have been answered but the reason for the call light was not resolved which would require longer wait times to find the appropriate staff. So while call light response time is a good variable, it does not tell the whole picture on patients getting their needs met.

References (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

Bennett, J., Briggs, W., & Triola, M. (2018). Statistical Reasoning for Everyday Life (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson

Accounting 325

Assignment Choice #1: Stock and Share Accounting

Complete the following exercise. Fill in the Excel spreadsheet provided via the link at the bottom of the page to provide your answers to parts a, b, and c. Then paste the Excel data into a Word document on which you can also write the answer to part d.

Label each exercise or problem clearly. Use APA formatting and citation if needed.

Uzi Company received a charter granting the right to issue 200,000 shares of $1.00 par value common stock and 10,000 shares of 8% cumulative and nonparticipating, $50.00 par value preferred stock that is callable at $80.00 per share. Selected transactions are presented below.




Issued 45,000 shares of common stock at par for cash.


Gave the corporation’s promoters 30,000 shares of common stock for their services in getting the corporation organized. The directors valued the services at $50,000.



Exchanged 100,000 shares of common stock for the following assets at fair market values: land, $25,000; building, $100,000; and machinery, $125,000.



Closed the Income Summary account. A $25,000 loss was incurred.




Issued 1,000 shares of preferred stock at $75 per share.



The board of directors declared an 8% dividend on preferred shares and $0.10 per share on outstanding common shares, payable on January 31 to the January 17 stockholders of record.


Closed the Income Summary account. A $69,000 net income was earned.




Paid the previously declared dividends.


  • Prepare general journal entries to record the selected transactions.
  • Prepare a stockholders’ equity section as of the close of business on December 31, 20X2.
  • Determine the book value per preferred share and per common stock as of December 31, 20X2.
  • Provide a rationale between 200 and 300 words in length for buying or not buying this stock based on the financial information presented.

thank you for your time

Select the following link to watch a short video with highlights of the Bhagavad Gita:

Do a little research using the search engine of your choice and find out some background on the Bhagavad Gita and its role in Hinduism.

Select the following link to explore the text of the Bhagavad Gita with an English Translation:

Choose a passage that you find meaningful.

In one paragraph, explain your understanding of the Bhagavad Gita and its role in Hinduism based upon your research. .

In one or more paragraphs, cite the passage you selected, summarize the contents of your particular passage, and provide your interpretation of the meaning of your passage in its context of the larger work.

In a final paragraph, reflect on any comparisons to other literary or religious texts you have encountered and describe the experience of your encounter with the Bhagavad Gita.

(Combined, these paragraphs should total at least one page in length.)

i want you to write 2 paragraph (Summary and Analysis)

i want you to write 2 paragraph (Summary and Analysis)

– First paragraph Summary the article in 6-8 sentences in one paragraph

– second paragraph Analysis the article in 6-8 sentences in one paragraph

i want you to follow up with summary Outline

pleas fill the blank for analysis Outline with short sentences

Case Studies: Lehman Brothers, British Petroleum, Monsanto, Merck

Currrent Business Problems: Case Studies: Lehman Brothers, British Petroleum, Monsanto, Merck, …

This discussion assignment requires you to submit at least four posts: an initial post, two reply posts to fellow students in threads other than your own, and a revised post.

Prepare Icon

Prepare: In your first post in this discussion, you will identify and apply one ethical theory of your choosing to a current problem in business, also of your choosing. Start by reviewing your notes on the Week One course material and your completed work for Week One. Then, choose one of the three ethical theories—i.e., utilitarianism, deontology, or virtue ethics—on the basis of your thoughtfully considered preference in general and independent of the business problem that you will select here. Keep in mind that you will employ this ethical theory for supporting your position not only for this discussion, but also for this week’s assignment and the Final Project.

To prepare for your selection of the current problem in business, look at the list of required articles and multimedia which are divided in the six case-categories as follows:

  • Banking (Lehman Brothers)
  • Environment (BP)
  • GMOs (Monsanto)
  • Pharmaceuticals (Merck)
  • Gender Discrimination (Goodyear)
  • Factory Farms (Perdue)

Choose the case-category that you find the most interesting and note that each category also corresponds to one particular case. Please choose carefully because your choice for this discussion will establish the case that will be central to your argumentative essay this week as well as your Final Project in Week Five. It is recommended that you leaf through all the required resources indicated for the possible case-categories that you identify as possible contenders before making your final choice.

Reflect Icon

Reflect: Once you have selected your ethical theory and your case category, articulate the characteristics of the economic system (or combination of both systems) that serves as the setting for the case presented in the case category sources. Given this context, examine how the nation’s laws affect the operations of the business.

Next, identify the characteristics of your chosen ethical theory and its notion of the moral good. For the latter, you will need to review again the PowerPoint that was introduced in Week One, which is also listed in this week’s Required Resources and it is titled The Moral Good in Three Traditional Ethical Theories. Then, think how you would apply the ethical theory to the specific problem presented in the case category sources.

Write Icon

Write: Start your post by (a) identifying the issue or problem that you want to address in the case that you have selected and providing an impartial presentation of the controversy, (b) articulating briefly the characteristics of the economic system that serves as the setting, and (c) examining the laws that affect the operations of the business.

The following illustration should help. Consider, for example, the case of Uber that we examined in Week Two. If the California decision establishes a precedent for similar claims, then Uber would have to do business as an employer and not merely as a service that pairs consumers with ride sharing services by means of a unique phone app. Accordingly, the law would require Uber to reimburse its drivers for certain costs and perhaps offer benefits. Take in consideration, then, the legal setting for the case that you have chosen. Does the case take place in the United States or another country? What are the laws that are relevant to the problem under examination? Keep in mind that all laws are constraints on our actions, whether those by individuals or corporations. The relevant laws, then, will be (a) any laws that present not only a constraint on the company’s operations, (b) any laws that are being violated by the corporation, or (c) any laws that unfairly limit the goods and services that can be offered to and are demanded by consumers.

In a second paragraph, formulate a sentence that presents the moral position that you want to defend in regard to the issue or problem introduced in the previous paragraph.

In the same paragraph, present the ethical theory that you choose to employ. Your choices are utilitarianism, deontology, and virtue ethics, and the necessary material is included in the required readings and media. Make sure to identify the characteristics of the ethical theory, and include in-text citations and full references in APA form at the end of the post. Once you have done this, apply the ethical theory to your selected case by explaining how it lends itself to the moral position that you are defending.

Revise: Read the feedback provided by your professor to your initial post, either directly to you or to your fellow students. Use this as an opportunity to learn from your professor, especially with regard to the best ways to apply the course material and your research to your analysis. On the basis of what you have learned in this process, post a revision of your initial post that applies the additional knowledge that you have gained.

Remember that your grade depends on the quality of your initial and revised responses, not just on the submission of an attempt at improvement. It is thus to your advantage to post the best initial post you can and then to also improve that best effort as much as you can through revision. Taking this process seriously will help you develop the skills you need to do well on the final project.

Requirements for Your Initial Post:

  • Your initial post should be at least 400 words in length and have citations and references in APA notation. It should address the prompt in its entirety. This means that you should not split your response to the prompt in multiple posts. Your examination should be both thorough and succinct. This is a combination that demands time and thought, so give yourself sufficient time to draft and revise.
  • Please be advised that until you post, you will not see what your fellow students are posting. Once you submit your post, you will be able to view the posts from your other classmates. You can then proceed to reply to at least two different threads based on the required material for this discussion.
  • Your list of references for your initial post should include the videos and the other required reading material pertaining to your chosen subject heading, as well as the ethics, economic, and law components of Weeks One and Two, the Instructor Guidance, and any other announcements presented to you by your professor. In addition, your references should include any other sources that you consult to inform yourself about your chosen case category (but not Wikipedia or similar sources).
  • Your initial post for this discussion should be submitted no later than the end of Thursday (11:59 pm, U.S. Mountain time).

Requirements for Replies to Other Threads:

  • At least two of the four posts required should be in the form of replies to fellow classmates in threads other than your own.
  • Each of your replies should be at least 200 words and informed by the required course material. As such, the replies must have citations and references in APA notation. Your list of references for each reply should include all of the course material that has informed your reply, in addition to any research that you have obtained on your own.
  • Your replies should focus on the specific examination presented by your fellow student and these should include an examination of whether or not the characteristics of the ethical theory and/or economic system were identified well, and whether or not their application and analysis were also carried out successfully. Providing such an examination is not an attack on your fellow student but an attempt to work together with your fellow student toward the better understanding of the ethical theories employed, as well as their application.

Requirements for Revising your Initial Post:

  • Submit a revision of your initial post by either replying to your own post, or to the feedback provided to you by your professor.
  • There is no minimum word requirement for your revised initial post. But you should always explain the reasons for revising your post so that it is clear what you are doing. If you are revising only a few words, or an ethical theory, you should avoidsubmitting a post with vague language such as: “another ethical theory works better here” or “I now understand how to do the analysis.” It is important to recognize that no one can read your mind so you need to provide the setting for your revision (Why? What prompted it? What course material informed you?).
  • Your revised initial post is your chance to correct any oversights or errors in your initial post, or show your improved understanding of the material and its applications to the case at hand. You may, for example, come to the realization that another ethical theory is better than the one that you initially chose. Accordingly, your revision should indicate that you chose another ethical theory and an explanation why you find the replacement more suitable. You may also find the need to revise any relevant portions of your analysis. Or, you might have realized that your conclusion did not take into account important factors necessary for your evaluation of the situation.
  • You should maximize the improvement of your initial post by employing your professor’s feedback as a guide. Keep in mind that you may not always receive direct feedback from your professor. But your professor will have submitted feedback in the discussion to other posts. So read your professor’s feedback whether it is addressed to you directly or to other fellow students. This will give you much to think about and apply to your own post.
  • If your professor or a fellow classmate responds to your revised initial post, and on this basis, you find good reason to submit yet another revision, then by all means do so. The more you improve your initial post, the more you will benefit both in terms of your learning and most likely your grade.

Carefully review the Discussion Forum Grading Rubric for the criteria that will be used to evaluate this Discussion Thread.

  • Hardy, J, Foster, C., & Zúñiga y Postigo, G. (2015). Section 9.1: The Argumentative Essay. In With good reason: A guide to critical thinking. Retrieved from
    • Section 9.1: The Argumentative Essay is a section of Chapter 9 of the introductory course in logic textbook that is employed in the PHI103 Informal Logic course offered at Ashford University. The link for this source will take you to a PDF format of this chapter. Section 9.1 introduces the thesis and premises in an argumentative essay, which are elements that students in this course must employ in both assignments in this course.
  • Hardy, J, Foster, C., & Zúñiga y Postigo, G. (2015). Section 9.2: Strengthening the Argumentative Essay. In With good reason: A guide to critical thinking.Retrieved from
    • Section 9.2: Strengthening the Argumentative Essay is a section of Chapter 9 of the introductory course in logic textbook that is employed in the PHI103 Informal Logic course offered at Ashford University. The link for this source will take you to a PDF format of this chapter. For the purposes of the work for this week, it will be necessary to read only thesubsection called Clarification and Support. This subsection explains the kind of support needed in an argumentative essay for the claims offered in its premises, which students in this course must know in order to apply in discussions and both assignments.
  • Zúñiga y Postigo, G. (2015). The moral good in three traditional ethical theories [PowerPoint Slides].
    • This PowerPoint document covers the main characteristics of utilitarianism, deontology, and virtue ethics, and what is the moral good in each of these.
  • ENG 124 Cuyamaca The Purpose of Education Martin Luther King

    Step 1 Review the following presentation on Rhetoric

    Step 2 Read the following essay

    Read “The Purpose of Education” by Dr. Martin Luther King

    Step 3 Post your main response

    Write a two paragraph response (250-300 words) explaining the rhetoric used. Please use the PIE method reviewed in Week 1.

    Address these questions in your response:

    What can you say about the creditability of the author?

    Who is the audience?

    What historical context was it written in?

    What is the purpose of the piece?

    Was the author successful?

    Why, and how?

    Step 4 Read and respond to other students’ posts.

    Read other students’ posts and respond to at least two of them. In addition to any other comments you may have, respond to the following:

    • What struggles do you share with your classmate?
    • Do you agree with a viewpoint? Why?
    • Provide clarity on the reading for others if you can.
    • Ask a question for your own clarity of the reading.

    Use your personal experience, if it’s relevant, to support or debate other students’ posts. If differences of opinion occur, debate the issues professionally and provide examples to support opinions.

    Please respond to at least two (2) classmates to meet the minimum requirement.

    1. Initial posts are due by WEDNESDAY at 11:59 PM Pacific Time
    2. Response postings should be completed no later than FRIDAY at 11:59 PM Pacific Time
    3. The key to a good discussion is interaction. Therefore, it is expected that you will log in and participate in the discussions on four (4) separate days per unit.
    4. Additional Prompts are due by SATURDAY at 11:59 PM Pacific Time
    5. Please note that posting all, or the majority, of your replies on the last day of the discussion after 6:00 pm will be considered for point deduction since this greatly decreases the interaction and impact of your posts.
    6. Interaction is the key to a productive and meaningful discussion between you, your peers, and your instructor, so your goal and approach should be meaningful interaction rather than meeting minimum point requirements.