Points: 150
|
Assignment 2: Bidding on a Contract with the Navy
|
Criteria
|
Unacceptable
Below 60% F
|
Meets Minimum Expectations
60-69% D
|
Fair
70-79% C
|
Proficient
80-89% B
|
Exemplary
90-100% A
|
1. Suggest three (3) ways in which the basic concepts of the FAR Policy would mutually benefit your small business and the Navy.
Weight: 35%
|
Did not submit or incompletely suggested ways in which the basic concepts of the FAR Policy would mutually benefit your small business and the Navy.
|
Insufficiently suggested ways in which the basic concepts of the FAR Policy would mutually benefit your small business and the Navy.
|
Partially suggested ways in which the basic concepts of the FAR Policy would mutually benefit your small business and the Navy.
|
Satisfactorily suggested three (3) ways in which the basic concepts of the FAR Policy would mutually benefit your small business and the Navy.
|
Thoroughly suggested three (3) ways in which the basic concepts of the FAR Policy would mutually benefit your small business and the Navy.
|
2. Determine the method that you will use for solicitation of a bid. Next, explain why the Navy is likely to choose your company in the sealed-bidding process.
Weight: 40%
|
Did not submit or incompletely determined the method that you will use for solicitation of a bid and did not submit or incompletely explained why the Navy is likely to choose your company in the sealed-bidding process.
|
Insufficiently determined the method that you will use for solicitation of a bid and insufficiently explained why the Navy is likely to choose your company in the sealed-bidding process.
|
Partially determined the method that you will use for solicitation of a bid and partially explained why the Navy is likely to choose your company in the sealed-bidding process.
|
Satisfactorily determined the method that you will use for solicitation of a bid and satisfactorily explained why the Navy is likely to choose your company in the sealed-bidding process.
|
Thoroughly determined the method that you will use for solicitation of a bid and thoroughly explained why the Navy is likely to choose your company in the sealed-bidding process.
|
3. 3 references
Weight: 5%
|
No references provided
|
Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.
|
Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.
|
Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.
|
Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.
|
4. Writing mechanics, grammar, and formatting
Weight: 5%
|
Serious and persistent errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.
|
Numerous errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation.
|
Partially free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.
|
Mostly free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.
|
Error free or almost error free grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.
|
5. Appropriate use of APA in-text citations and reference section
Weight: 5%
|
Lack of in-text citations and / or lack of reference section.
|
In-text citations and references are given, but not in APA format.
|
In-text citations and references are provided, but they are only partially formatted correctly in APA style.
|
Most in-text citations and references are provided, and they are generally formatted correctly in APA style.
|
In-text citations and references are error free or almost error free and consistently formatted correctly in APA style.
|
6. Information literacy / Integration of sources
Weight: 5%
|
Serious errors in the integration of sources, such as intentional or accidental plagiarism, or failure to use in-text citations.
|
Sources are rarely integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.
|
Sources are partially integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.
|
Sources are mostly integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.
|
Sources are consistently integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.
|
7. Clarity and coherence of writing
5%
|
Information is confusing to the reader and fails to include reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.
|
Information is somewhat confusing with not enough reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.
|
Information is partially clear with minimal reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.
|
Information is mostly clear and generally supported with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.
|
Information is provided in a clear, coherent, and consistent manner with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.
|